Sample size 200
Completed / Failed 200 / 0
When facing a supply shortage of a proprietary pre-mix product during a critical application window, which strategy do you prioritize?
Purchase individual active ingredients to tank-mix and replicate the required chemistry on-site
62.5%
n=125
Respondents for this option · Drivers
Minimizing operational downtime and adhering to the application schedule
Maintaining consistent technical efficacy and crop protection standards
Managing overall input costs and procurement efficiency
Reducing the complexity and labor requirements of on-site mixing
Source a different branded pre-mix with a similar, though not identical, chemical profile
29.0%
n=58
Respondents for this option · Drivers
Minimizing operational downtime and adhering to the application schedule
Maintaining consistent technical efficacy and crop protection standards
Mitigating long-term resistance management risks
Managing overall input costs and procurement efficiency
Wait for the proprietary pre-mix to become available, even if it delays application
4.0%
n=8
Respondents for this option · Drivers
Maintaining consistent technical efficacy and crop protection standards
Mitigating long-term resistance management risks
Switch to a completely different class of chemistry that is currently in stock
3.5%
n=7
Respondents for this option · Drivers
Minimizing operational downtime and adhering to the application schedule
Skip the application for this cycle and adjust the pest management program accordingly
1.0%
n=2
Respondents for this option · Drivers
Maintaining consistent technical efficacy and crop protection standards
Purchase individual active ingredients to tank-mix and replicate the required chemistry on-site audience
Professional row crop managers prioritize on-site tank-mixing as a primary strategy during proprietary product shortages.
125 / 200 respondents62.5%
Respondents in the West are significantly more likely to favor replicating chemistry on-site compared to the general baseline.
The segment shows a higher representation of female managers and individuals with some college education.
Key differences
Potential risks
Sampling data
